中国榜 · 商界 China · Business

品牌价值Brand Value

加权求和模型 · 排名更新日期:2026-10-20Weighted sum model · Last updated: 2026-10-20

综述Overview

A brand is an enterprise's intangible asset and, more importantly, a micro projection of national competitiveness. The strength of a country ultimately manifests in a group of brands with global influence that can sustainably create value and win public trust. Brand value (Brand Equity / Brand Value) is the monetized measure of this intangible asset—it encompasses both the brand's financial contribution and its recognition, trust, and loyalty in the minds of consumers.
品牌是企业的无形资产,更是国家竞争力的微观投射。一个国家的强大,最终体现为一批具有全球影响力、能够持续创造价值、赢得公众信任的品牌。品牌价值(Brand Equity / Brand Value)即这一无形资产以货币化形式衡量的结果——它既包含品牌的财务贡献,也包含品牌在消费者心智中的认知、信任与忠诚。
Modern brand theory provides a clear definitional lineage for "brand value": David Aaker proposed the "Brand Equity Five-Star Model", decomposing brand equity into brand loyalty, brand awareness, perceived quality, brand associations, and other proprietary assets; Kevin Keller proposed the "Customer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE)" model, emphasizing that brand value originates from brand knowledge in the customer's cognitive structure; and authoritative institutions such as the World Brand Lab, Kantar BrandZ, and Interbrand have turned it into comparable monetary valuations—the World Brand Lab evaluates by "brand financial value + brand added value", BrandZ measures by "financial value × brand contribution", and Interbrand discounts by "brand earnings × brand strength".
现代品牌理论为"品牌价值"提供了清晰的定义谱系:大卫·艾克(David Aaker)提出"品牌资产五星模型",将品牌资产分解为品牌忠诚、品牌认知、感知质量、品牌联想与其他专有资产;凯文·凯勒(Kevin Keller)提出"基于顾客的品牌资产(CBBE)"模型,强调品牌价值源于顾客认知结构中的品牌知识;而世界品牌实验室(World Brand Lab)、Kantar BrandZ、Interbrand 等权威机构则将其落为可比较的货币估值——世界品牌实验室以"品牌财务价值+品牌附加值"评估,BrandZ 以"财务价值×品牌贡献"测算,Interbrand 以"品牌收益×品牌强度"折现。
This index synthesizes the above frameworks and constructs a weighted-sum model from four indicators—brand value, brand influence, industry standing, and revenue scale—to evaluate about fifty of China's most valuable brands. The model assigns the highest weight to brand value (the core measure of intangible assets), supplemented by influence (recognition and reputation), industry standing (competitive barriers and pricing power), and revenue scale (the financial base), striving to balance "monetary valuation" and "market strength" and objectively depict the full picture of brand value.
本指数综合上述框架,从品牌价值、品牌影响力、行业地位、营收规模四项指标构建加权求和模型,对中国最具价值的约五十个品牌进行评价。模型以品牌价值(无形资产核心度量)为最高权重,辅以影响力(认知与美誉)、行业地位(竞争壁垒与定价权)与营收规模(财务底盘),力求在"货币估值"与"市场实力"之间取得平衡,客观刻画品牌价值的全貌。
Evaluation results: State Grid, ICBC, Kweichow Moutai, Tencent, and Huawei rank in the top five. Overall, leaders in foundational national industries such as finance, energy, and communications rank highest thanks to their scale and standing, with technology/internet and high-end consumer brands following closely thanks to their high influence. This ranking is referenced to authoritative brand lists and public financial data, based mainly on approximate values from public common knowledge, permanently free and public, and provided for research and reference only.
评价结果:国家电网、工商银行、贵州茅台、腾讯、华为 位列前五。整体看,金融、能源与通信等国家基础行业龙头以其规模与地位居前,科技互联网与高端消费品牌凭借高影响力紧随其后。本排名数据以权威品牌榜单与公开财务数据为参照、公开常识近似值为主,永久免费公开,仅供研究与参考。

分层梯队Tiers

A++ 前三Top 3 A+ 四至十4th–10th A 十一至二十11th–20th B 其余Rest

中国最具价值品牌排名(约50席)Most Valuable Brand Ranking in China (about 50)

排名品牌品牌价值指数品牌价值(亿)品牌影响力行业地位营收(亿)梯队
1国家电网State Grid98.3758009610038000A++
2工商银行ICBC82.14560094958600A++
3贵州茅台Kweichow Moutai75.795000100931400A++
4腾讯Tencent75.52550098796100A+
5华为Huawei74.64540099777000A+
6阿里巴巴Alibaba68.17460097789000A+
7中国移动China Mobile62.983200959610000A+
8建设银行CCB58.88420079837700A+
9农业银行Agricultural Bank of China54.34380078826900A+
10字节跳动ByteDance51.65300093768000A+
11中国石油PetroChina51.181800749830000A
12中国石化Sinopec50.741750739732000A
13中国银行Bank of China49.83340077816200A
14中国平安Ping An47.922600808610500A
15五粮液Wuliangye44.6828009271830A
16中国建筑China State Construction43.451550729422000A
17中国人寿China Life41.86220075878000A
18招商银行China Merchants Bank38.49230076803400A
19海尔Haier37.73200091702600A
20美的Midea36.51190090693700A
21京东JD.com35.821400867510800B
22拼多多Pinduoduo34.63170085743400B
23宁德时代CATL34.43160087734000B
24比亚迪BYD33.96145088726000B
25格力Gree31.6150089682000B
26小米Xiaomi26.15135084622700B
27中国电信China Telecom25.93100066855000B
28上汽集团SAIC Motor24.9980063887000B
29中国中铁China Railway Group24.36830549012000B
30中国联通China Unicom23.7590065843700B
31百度Baidu23.08115083611300B
32中国铁建China Railway Construction23.07820538911000B
33美团Meituan22.4110082602700B
34中粮COFCO21.1378052916000B
35泸州老窖Luzhou Laojiao20.6112007167300B
36网易NetEase20.49105081591000B
37中国中车CRRC19.2272051922500B
38洋河股份Yanghe Brewery17.929807066300B
39伊利Yili17.2195069651200B
40蒙牛Mengniu15.698806864900B
41青岛啤酒Tsingtao Brewery13.627606763320B
42顺丰SF Express10.4785064542600B
43万科Vanke7.8674056564600B
44吉利汽车Geely Automobile7.7470062532000B
45中芯国际SMIC6.656005858500B
46长城汽车Great Wall Motor6.4766061521700B
47海康威视Hikvision5.835805757900B
48理想汽车Li Auto5.1262060511200B
49保利发展Poly Developments and Holdings5.0456055553400B
50蔚来NIO3.365405950550B

算法详细论述Methodology

一、品牌价值的多维定义与理论依据

This algorithm does not presuppose a single brand-value caliber; instead, it synthesizes mainstream brand-equity theory and authoritative valuation methods and maps them onto the model's four indicators:
本算法不预设单一的品牌价值口径,而是综合主流的品牌资产理论与权威估值方法,将其映射到模型的四个指标:
  1. 大卫·艾克《管理品牌资产》(1991):品牌资产五星模型——品牌忠诚、品牌认知、感知质量、品牌联想、其他专有资产。为"品牌影响力"(认知与美誉)与"行业地位"(忠诚与壁垒)提供理论依据。
  2. 凯文·凯勒《基于顾客的品牌资产 CBBE》(1993):品牌价值源于顾客心智中的品牌知识,含品牌意识与品牌形象——为"品牌影响力"(消费者认知)提供依据。
  3. 世界品牌实验室《中国500最具价值品牌》:以"品牌财务价值+品牌附加值"评估,品牌附加值由品牌认知度、品牌忠诚度、领导地位、品牌个性等构成——为"品牌价值"货币化提供方法依据。
  4. Kantar BrandZ:品牌价值=财务价值×品牌贡献,其中品牌贡献衡量品牌对购买决策的驱动比例——为"影响力×财务"的相乘逻辑提供参照。
  5. Interbrand:品牌价值=品牌收益×品牌强度(品牌强度含领导力、稳定性、市场、国际化等十因素)——为"行业地位"(领导力/壁垒)提供依据。
  6. 波特五力模型与产业组织理论:行业地位即竞争壁垒与定价权(护城河),地位越高越能获取超额收益——为"行业地位"的权重设计提供经济学依据。

二、模型的数学结构

The brand-value index adopts a weighted-sum model. The four indicators are first min-max normalized into the [0,1] interval (to remove scale differences) and then linearly combined by weight:
品牌价值指数采用加权求和模型。四项指标先经 min-max 归一化映射到 [0,1] 区间(消除量纲差异),再按权重线性合成:
指标′ = (指标 − 指标min) / (指标max − 指标min) 品牌价值指数 = 100 × (0.45·品牌价值′ + 0.20·品牌影响力′ + 0.20·行业地位′ + 0.15·营收规模′)
The four weights always sum to 1.0. Among them, brand value carries the highest weight (0.45)—as the most direct monetized measure of the brand as an intangible asset, it should be the dominant variable in the ranking; brand influence and industry standing each account for 0.20, respectively characterizing the two quality dimensions of "recognition and reputation" and "competitive barriers"; revenue scale accounts for 0.15, serving as the financial base to prevent a purely brand-driven narrative from detaching from actual operational scale.
四项权重之和恒为 1.0。其中品牌价值权重最高(0.45)——它是品牌这一无形资产最直接的货币化度量,理应成为排名的主导变量;品牌影响力与行业地位各占 0.20,分别刻画"认知美誉"与"竞争壁垒"两个质量维度;营收规模占 0.15,作为财务底盘,防止纯品牌叙事脱离实际经营规模。

三、指标与权重依据

指标方向权重含义依据
品牌价值正向0.45品牌的货币化估值(亿元)世界品牌实验室 / BrandZ / Interbrand 估值
品牌影响力正向0.20消费者认知度、美誉度与忠诚度(0-100)Aaker 五星模型;Keller CBBE
行业地位正向0.20竞争壁垒、定价权与领导地位(0-100)波特五力;Interbrand 品牌强度
营收规模正向0.15年营业收入(亿元)《财富》中国企业500强;上市公司年报
Weight-design logic: brand value (0.45), as the core variable, carries the highest weight; brand influence (0.20) and industry standing (0.20) constitute the "dual wings of quality", totaling 0.40 and together characterizing the market attributes that distinguish a brand from a mere financial valuation; revenue scale (0.15) is a base-position correction term that prevents "hollow brands" detached from actual operational capability from being overvalued.
权重设计逻辑:品牌价值(0.45)作为核心变量权重最高;品牌影响力(0.20)与行业地位(0.20)构成"质量双翼",二者合计 0.40,共同刻画品牌区别于单纯财务估值的市场属性;营收规模(0.15)为底仓修正项,防止脱离实际经营能力的"空心品牌"被高估。

四、数据来源与局限性

Brand value, brand influence, industry standing, and revenue scale all use approximate values from public common knowledge: brand value refers to the historical ranges of lists such as the World Brand Lab's "China's 500 Most Valuable Brands", the Hurun Brand List, and Kantar BrandZ; revenue scale refers to the Fortune "China's Top 500 Enterprises" and the disclosure calibers of listed companies' annual reports. All approximate values are marked "subject to confirmation by official sources / each list's current period". Brand influence and industry standing are 0-100 subjective scores based on public perception and thus contain some subjectivity.
品牌价值、品牌影响力、行业地位、营收规模均采用公开常识近似值:品牌价值参照世界品牌实验室《中国500最具价值品牌》、胡润品牌榜、Kantar BrandZ 等榜单的历年区间;营收规模参照《财富》中国企业500强及上市公司年报披露口径。所有近似值均标注"以官方/各榜当期为准确认"。品牌影响力与行业地位为基于公开认知的 0-100 主观评分,存在一定主观性。
This model adopts a weighted sum with a transparent, reproducible structure, but it still has limitations: ① brand value itself is the result of multiple valuation methods, and different institutions' calibers differ considerably; ② the influence and standing scores contain subjective components; ③ dynamic indicators such as brand growth momentum and degree of internationalization are not included. The ranking is for research reference only and does not constitute investment advice.
本模型采用加权求和,结构透明、可复现,但仍有局限:①品牌价值本身即多种估值方法的结果,不同机构口径差异较大;②影响力与地位评分含主观成分;③未纳入品牌增长动能、国际化程度等动态指标。排名仅供研究参考,不构成投资建议。

五、参考文献

  1. David A. Aaker(1991):《Managing Brand Equity》,Free Press。
  2. Kevin Lane Keller(1993):"Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity",Journal of Marketing。
  3. 世界品牌实验室(World Brand Lab):《中国500最具价值品牌》年度报告。
  4. 胡润研究院(Hurun Research Institute):《胡润品牌榜》年度报告。
  5. Kantar BrandZ:《最具价值中国品牌100强》/《最具价值全球品牌》年度报告。
  6. Interbrand:《Best Global Brands》年度报告。
  7. Michael E. Porter:《Competitive Strategy》(五力模型),Free Press。
  8. 《财富》(Fortune):中国企业500强榜单(营收规模参照)。
  9. 相关上市公司年度报告及公开财务披露。

说明Notes

本版采用加权求和模型:品牌价值指数 = 100×(0.45·品牌价值′ + 0.20·品牌影响力′ + 0.20·行业地位′ + 0.15·营收规模′),四项权重之和恒为 1.0,品牌价值权重最高。四项指标先经 min-max 归一化消除量纲差异,再线性合成。数据为公开常识近似值(参照世界品牌实验室《中国500最具价值品牌》、胡润品牌榜、Kantar BrandZ、《财富》中国企业500强等),以官方/各榜当期为准确认。品牌影响力与行业地位为 0-100 主观评分,含一定主观性,仅供研究与参考。
This edition adopts a weighted-sum model: brand value index = 100×(0.45·brand value′ + 0.20·brand influence′ + 0.20·industry standing′ + 0.15·revenue scale′), with the four weights always summing to 1.0 and brand value having the highest weight. The four indicators are first min-max normalized to eliminate dimensional differences and then linearly combined. Data are public approximate values (referencing the World Brand Lab "China's 500 Most Valuable Brands", the Hurun brand list, Kantar BrandZ, Fortune "China 500", etc.), confirmed against official/current list figures. Brand influence and industry standing are 0-100 subjective scores with some subjectivity, for research and reference only.