综述Overview

Digital technology is a core engine of the new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation, deeply integrating into and reshaping the production, circulation and management of the real economy through such forms as artificial intelligence, cloud computing, big data, the Internet of Things, 5G/6G, cybersecurity, industrial software and enterprise digitalization services. From communication networks to computing-power infrastructure, and from intelligent IoT to industry software and security foundations, digital-technology enterprises form the backbone of a country's digital-economy competitiveness and serve as the supply-side actors of 'digital-real integration' (digitalization empowering the real economy).

数字技术是新一轮科技革命与产业变革的核心引擎，正以人工智能、云计算、大数据、物联网、5G/6G、网络安全、工业软件、企业数字化服务等形态，深度融入并重塑实体经济的生产、流通与管理方式。从通信网络到算力基础设施，从智能物联到行业软件与安全底座，数字技术企业构成了国家数字经济竞争力的中坚力量，也是"数实融合"（数字化赋能实体经济）的供给侧主体。

This ranking follows the CPPPS proprietary evaluation algorithm; it does not copy any public ranking, but computes its own rankings from underlying public data. It selects six core indicators—operating revenue, net profit, market value, R&D investment, patent count and digitalization empowerment—mapped onto the four evaluation dimensions of 'Scale, Quality, Innovation and Contribution': operating revenue represents business scale and market share; net profit and market value represent profitability quality and capital-market recognition; R&D investment and patent count represent technological innovation capability; and digitalization empowerment (serving the digitalization of the real economy) represents industry contribution—this is the CPPPS distinctive dimension, measuring how deeply an enterprise helps myriad industries digitalize through software, cloud, platforms and solutions, a perspective generally missing from international rankings.

本排名依据 CPPPS 自有评价算法，不摘抄任何公开榜单名次，以底层公开数据自算排名。选取营业收入、净利润、市值、研发投入、专利数、数字化赋能六项核心指标，对应"规模、质量、创新、贡献"四个评价维度：营业收入代表经营规模与市场份额；净利润与市值代表盈利质量与资本认可度；研发投入与专利数代表技术创新能力；数字化赋能（服务实体经济数字化）代表行业贡献——这是 CPPPS 特色维度，衡量企业以软件、云、平台、解决方案等方式助力千行百业数字化的深度，为国际通用榜单普遍缺失的评价视角。

The evaluation model adopts weighted summation: the six indicators are standardized and then linearly aggregated by weight to yield a composite strength score on a 0–100 scale. Among them, revenue, market value, patents and R&D are treated as large-span indicators and log-transformed to avoid head enterprises monopolizing the score gap; net profit (including negative values) and the digitalization-empowerment index are linearly normalized; and digitalization empowerment forms a dimension on its own, highlighting the evaluative orientation of 'digital-real integration' contribution.

评价模型采用加权求和法：六项指标经标准化后按权重线性加总，得到 0-100 的综合实力分。其中营收、市值、专利、研发作为大跨度指标取对数处理，避免头部企业垄断分差；净利润（含负值）与数字化赋能指数线性归一化；数字化赋能单独成维，凸显"数实融合"贡献这一评价导向。

Evaluation results: Huawei Technologies, ZTE, Hikvision, Lenovo Group and NARI Technology rank in the top five; Huawei Technologies, ZTE, Hikvision, Lenovo Group, NARI Technology, Unisplendour, Inspur Information, iFlytek, Dahua Technology and Sugon make up the top ten. Overall, head enterprises with a large scale, steady profitability, sustained high R&D investment and strong digitalization-empowerment capability rank ahead, while enterprises focused heavily on distribution, light on R&D or tilted toward the consumer end rank lower because of relatively weak innovation investment and digital contribution, reflecting the balanced evaluative orientation of 'Scale, Quality, Innovation and Contribution'. This ranking is based on public-knowledge approximations marked 'subject to official figures', permanently free and public, and for research and reference only.

评价结果：华为技术、中兴通讯、海康威视、联想集团、国电南瑞位列前五；华为技术、中兴通讯、海康威视、联想集团、国电南瑞、紫光股份、浪潮信息、科大讯飞、大华股份、中科曙光位列前十。整体看，规模庞大、盈利稳健、研发持续高投入且数字化赋能能力强的头部企业居前；部分重分销、轻研发或偏消费端的企业因创新投入与数字化贡献相对偏弱而位次靠后，体现了"规模、质量、创新、贡献"并重的评价导向。本排名数据以公开知识近似值为准、标注"以官方为准"，永久免费公开，仅供研究与参考。

分层梯队Tiers

A++ 前三Top 3 A+ 四至十4th–10th A 十一至二十11th–20th B 其余Rest

中国数字技术企业综合实力排名（约 25 家）Overall Strength Ranking of Chinese Digital Technology Companies (about 25)

排名	企业	地区	营收(亿)	净利(亿)	市值(亿)	研发(亿)	专利	数字化赋能	综合分	梯队
1	华为技术Huawei Technologies	广东深圳	7000	870	15000	1647	12.0万	92	100.0	A++
2	中兴通讯ZTE	广东深圳	1240	90	2100	250	8.5万	85	61.62	A++
3	海康威视Hikvision	浙江杭州	900	140	3000	110	2.1万	90	58.82	A++
4	联想集团Lenovo Group	北京	4000	100	1200	150	2.0万	60	50.9	A+
5	国电南瑞NARI Technology	江苏南京	500	70	1800	30	1.1万	90	47.84	A+
6	紫光股份Unisplendour	北京	700	20	700	35	1.5万	85	44.89	A+
7	浪潮信息Inspur Electronic Information	山东济南	650	20	600	30	1.2万	80	40.76	A+
8	科大讯飞iFlytek	安徽合肥	200	6	1100	40	1.5万	88	40.31	A+
9	大华股份Dahua Technology	浙江杭州	320	30	600	45	9000	75	34.8	A+
10	中科曙光Sugon	北京	130	15	800	15	8000	82	30.23	A+
11	用友网络Yonyou Network	北京	100	-10	400	25	5000	90	30.22	A
12	神州数码Digital China	北京	1200	10	300	5	1200	70	27.83	A
13	宝信软件Baosight Software	上海	150	25	700	15	3000	78	26.85	A
14	金山办公Kingsoft Office	北京	50	13	1300	15	4000	85	25.87	A
15	恒生电子Hundsun Technologies	浙江杭州	70	14	800	30	3000	80	25.26	A
16	金蝶国际Kingdee	广东深圳	60	-3	500	15	3000	88	24.6	A
17	中控技术Supcon Technology	浙江杭州	85	11	500	10	5000	82	24.16	A
18	广联达Glodon	北京	65	5	300	25	3000	82	22.2	A
19	深信服Sangfor	广东深圳	75	2	300	25	4000	78	21.75	A
20	金山软件Kingsoft	北京	90	10	500	25	5000	70	21.23	A
21	中国软件China Software	北京	90	-5	250	18	3000	75	19.28	B
22	三六零360 Security Technology	北京	90	-5	600	30	8000	60	18.32	B
23	奇安信Qi-Anxin	北京	60	-10	250	18	3000	70	14.44	B
24	东软集团Neusoft Corporation	辽宁沈阳	100	3	100	15	5000	65	13.25	B
25	启明星辰Venustech	北京	45	3	250	10	3000	65	9.09	B

算法详细论述Methodology

一、评价对象与依据

Digital-technology enterprises in this ranking refer to domestic and Hong Kong/Macau/Taiwan-capital-controlled enterprises whose main business is communication networks, computing-power infrastructure, intelligent IoT, artificial intelligence, software and cloud services, enterprise digitalization services, cybersecurity, industrial software and the like. The evaluation covers about 25 industry leaders and major listed/to-be-listed enterprises, selected on the basis of revenue volume, industry standing and the availability of public data. Unlisted enterprises (such as Huawei) are handled with approximate public-market valuations and noted in the remarks.

本排名所称数字技术企业，指以通信网络、算力基础设施、智能物联、人工智能、软件与云服务、企业数字化服务、网络安全、工业软件等为主营业务的境内及港澳台资本控股企业。评价范围覆盖行业头部与主要上市/拟上市企业约 25 家，选取依据为企业的营收体量、行业地位与公开数据可得性。未上市企业（如华为）按公开市场估值近似处理，并在说明中标注。

二、指标体系与理论依据

Enterprise strength is a multi-dimensional concept that a single revenue indicator cannot fully reflect. Drawing on the 'Scale—Quality—Innovation—Contribution' framework of enterprise-competitiveness evaluation, this model selects six indicators grouped into four dimensions:

企业实力是一个多维概念，单一营收指标无法全面反映。本模型借鉴企业竞争力评价的"规模—质量—创新—贡献"框架，选取六项指标、归入四个维度：

营业收入（规模维度）：反映企业经营体量与市场占有率，是企业综合实力的最直接体现，也是行业地位排序的基石。
净利润（质量维度）：反映企业真实盈利质量与经营效率，有效区分"规模"与"效益"，避免"大而不强"。
市值（质量维度）：反映资本市场对企业成长性与内在价值的定价，是前瞻性指标，能捕捉传统财务指标无法体现的成长预期。
研发投入（创新维度）：反映企业技术创新的资源投入强度，对应数字技术行业高研发密度的特征。
专利数（创新维度）：反映企业技术积累的存量与知识产权护城河，与研发投入形成"投入—产出"互补。
数字化赋能（贡献维度）：反映企业以软件、云、平台、解决方案等方式服务实体经济数字化的深度，对应"数实融合"的国家战略导向。

三、模型的数学结构

The six indicators differ in dimension and span and must first be standardized. Four large-span indicators—revenue, market value, patents and R&D—are log-transformed (in line with the principle of diminishing marginal returns to scale, to avoid head enterprises monopolizing the score gap); net profit and digitalization empowerment are normalized to 0–1 (min-max standardization); the results are then linearly aggregated by weight:

六项指标量纲与跨度不同，须先做标准化处理。对营收、市值、专利、研发四类大跨度指标取对数（依据规模经济边际递减原理，避免头部企业垄断分差），净利润与数字化赋能做 0-1 归一化（最小-最大标准化），再按权重线性加总：

x′ = (x − x_min) / (x_max − x_min)　；　对数类指标：x′ = (ln x − ln x_min) / (ln x_max − ln x_min) 综合实力分 = 100 × ( 0.30·营收′ + 0.15·净利′ + 0.15·市值′ + 0.15·研发′ + 0.10·专利′ + 0.15·数字化赋能′ )

The basis of the weight setting: operating revenue is the cornerstone of strength evaluation and carries the highest weight (0.30); net profit and market value together form the Quality dimension (0.30 in total), highlighting 'equal emphasis on scale and quality'; R&D and patents form the Innovation dimension (0.25 in total), in which the weight of R&D investment is higher than that of the patent stock (0.15 vs 0.10), emphasizing the resource intensity of current-period innovation; digitalization empowerment forms a dimension on its own (0.15), highlighting the CPPPS distinctive Contribution dimension. The six weights sum to 1, ensuring the score falls within the 0–100 range.

权重设定依据：营业收入是实力评价的基石，权重最高（0.30）；净利润与市值共同构成质量维度（合计 0.30），突出"规模与质量并重"；研发与专利构成创新维度（合计 0.25），其中研发投入权重高于专利存量（0.15 vs 0.10），强调当期创新的资源强度；数字化赋能单独成维（0.15），凸显 CPPPS 特色贡献维度。六项权重合计为 1，保证得分落在 0-100 区间。

四、指标与权重依据

指标	方向	权重	所属维度	处理	依据
营业收入	正向	0.30	规模	对数	体量与市占率；大跨度取对数避免垄断
净利润	正向	0.15	质量	线性	真实盈利质量，区分"规模"与"效益"
市值	正向	0.15	质量	对数	资本市场对成长性与价值的定价
研发投入	正向	0.15	创新	对数	高研发密度的当期创新强度
专利数	正向	0.10	创新	对数	技术存量与知识产权护城河
数字化赋能	正向	0.15	贡献	线性	服务实体经济数字化（数实融合）贡献

五、数字化赋能指数的构建

'Digitalization empowerment' is the CPPPS distinctive Contribution dimension; it uses a self-built index to measure an enterprise's comprehensive capability in serving the digitalization of the real economy, on a 0–100 scale. The index is synthesized from three aspects of public approximate information: (1) the coverage of enterprise-grade digitalization product lines (the breadth of software, cloud, platforms, industrial software and solutions); (2) the ability to serve industries in the real economy (the scale of digitalization projects and solutions in sectors such as government and enterprises, manufacturing, energy, finance and construction); (3) the industry breadth of 'digital-real integration' customers and the density of benchmark cases. Because this dimension is hard to measure with a single financial indicator, the index is normalized from public-knowledge approximations and explicitly noted in the data sources for reader calibration.

"数字化赋能"是 CPPPS 特色贡献维度，采用自建指数衡量企业服务实体经济数字化的综合能力，取值范围 0-100。该指数综合三方面公开近似信息合成：①企业级数字化产品线覆盖度（软件、云、平台、工业软件、解决方案的广度）；②面向实体经济的行业服务能力（政企、制造、能源、金融、建筑等行业的数字化项目与解决方案规模）；③"数实融合"的客户行业广度与标杆案例密度。由于该维度难以用单一财务指标度量，指数以公开知识近似值归一化处理，并在数据来源中显式标注，供读者校准。

六、模型的特点与局限

This model adopts a 'standardization + weighted summation' structure that is intuitive, reproducible and traceable, consistent with the CPPPS iron rules of 'open weights, open algorithm and open data sources'. Its limitations are: (1) the market value of unlisted enterprises (such as Huawei) is an approximation of public-market valuation and carries errors; (2) market value is fairly volatile under secondary-market sentiment; (3) net profit is affected by economic cycles and investment pacing, and some enterprises record current-period losses; (4) patent counts differ in caliber (applications/grants/cumulative totals); (5) the digitalization-empowerment index is a CPPPS self-built approximate index with a relatively high subjective component; (6) the list covers about 25 enterprises and does not exhaust all enterprises in every sub-sector. All these limitations are explicitly noted under the principle of 'open data sources'.

本模型为"标准化+加权求和"结构，含义直观、可复现、可追溯，符合 CPPPS"权重公开、算法公开、数据源公开"的铁律。其局限在于：①未上市企业（如华为）市值为公开市场估值近似，存在误差；②市值受二级市场情绪影响波动较大；③净利润受经济周期与投入节奏影响，部分企业当期亏损；④专利数存在口径差异（申请量/授权量/累计量）；⑤数字化赋能指数为 CPPPS 自建近似指数，主观成分相对较高；⑥榜单范围约 25 家，未穷尽所有细分领域企业。上述局限均在"数据源公开"原则下显式标注。

七、数据来源

Operating revenue, net profit, market value, R&D investment and patent count are all based on public-knowledge approximations (marked 'subject to official figures'), mainly referencing: the annual reports and periodic financial reports of listed companies, industry-association statistics, public market data and institutional valuations; the digitalization-empowerment index is a CPPPS self-built index synthesized approximately from public information. The data cut-off date is 2026-10-20.

营业收入、净利润、市值、研发投入、专利数均以公开知识近似值为准（标注"以官方为准"），主要参考：各上市公司年度报告与定期财务报告、行业协会统计、市场公开数据与机构估值；数字化赋能指数为 CPPPS 自建指数，基于公开信息近似合成。数据标注截止日为 2026-10-20。

八、参考文献

各数字技术上市公司年度报告、定期财务报告（营业收入、净利润、市值、研发投入）。
中国信息通信研究院（信通院）：《中国数字经济发展研究报告》。
中国电子信息产业发展研究院（赛迪研究院）：ICT 产业年度报告。
国家统计局：规模以上软件和信息技术服务业、计算机通信电子设备制造业统计公报。
国家知识产权局：企业发明专利授权与累计申请公开数据。
未上市企业公开披露信息与市场机构估值报告。

说明Notes

本版采用四维六指标自有算法（标准化+加权求和）：综合实力分 = 100×(0.30·营收 + 0.15·净利润 + 0.15·市值 + 0.15·研发投入 + 0.10·专利数 + 0.15·数字化赋能)。营收、市值、研发、专利作为大跨度指标取对数处理（避免头部企业垄断分差），净利润与数字化赋能做 0-1 归一化后线性加总。四维含义：营收=规模，净利+市值=质量，研发+专利=创新，数字化赋能=贡献（服务实体经济数字化，CPPPS 特色维度）。数据为公开知识近似值，以官方为准；华为未上市，市值采用公开市场估值近似；数字化赋能为 CPPPS 自建指数，存在一定主观性。排名范围约 25 家，数据标注截止日 2026-10-20。
This edition adopts a four-dimension six-indicator proprietary algorithm (standardization + weighted sum): composite strength score = 100×(0.16·revenue + 0.12·visitor volume + 0.16·net profit + 0.12·market cap + 0.22·innovation + 0.22·employment). Revenue, visitor volume, market cap, and employment are log-transformed as wide-span indicators (to avoid leading enterprises monopolizing score gaps), while net profit and innovation score are 0-1 normalized and then linearly summed. Four-dimension meaning: revenue + visitor volume = scale, net profit + market cap = quality, culture-tourism integration/digitalization = innovation, employment = contribution (culture and tourism absorbing employment, a CPPPS signature dimension). Data are public approximate values, subject to official figures; the innovation score is a qualitative assessment based on public information; different visitor-volume tracks use different bases, serving only as horizontal approximations of scale magnitude. The ranking covers about 25 companies, with data cutoff date 2026-10-20. This ranking is permanently free and public, and rankings are never sold.

数字技术行业Digital Technology Industry