中国榜 · 产业 China · Industry

物流行业Logistics Industry

CPPPS 四维自有算法(规模+质量+创新+贡献) · 排名更新日期:2026-10-20

综述Overview

Logistics is the "sinew" and "lifeblood" of the national economy, connecting manufacturing at one end and countless households at the other. China is already the world's largest logistics market: its express-delivery volume has ranked first in the world for many consecutive years, and the scale of its road freight, rail freight, and cross-border e-commerce logistics also leads the globe. The logistics industry is also a "reservoir" for employment — millions of couriers, truck drivers, warehouse workers, and on-demand delivery riders form the most substantial social foundation of this industry. Therefore, evaluating a logistics company cannot be based solely on revenue or profit; one must also look at how dense its network is, how strong its digitalization capability is, and how much employment it creates for society.
物流是国民经济的"筋络"与"血脉",一头连着生产制造,一头连着千家万户。中国已是全球最大的物流市场:快递业务量连续多年稳居世界第一,公路货运、铁路货运、跨境电商物流的规模同样冠绝全球。物流行业同时是吸纳就业的"蓄水池"——数以百万计的快递员、货车司机、仓储工人与即时配送骑手,构成了这个行业最厚重的社会底色。因此,评价一家物流企业,既不能"唯营收论",也不能只看利润,更要看它织就的网络有多密、数字化的能力有多强、为社会创造了多少就业。
This index does not copy the positions of any public list, but returns to underlying public data (operating revenue, network coverage, net profit, market value, digitalization/smart-logistics investment, and employment) to independently build a four-dimensional "Scale + Quality + Innovation + Contribution" algorithm, comprehensively evaluating about 25 of China's most representative logistics companies (covering the full spectrum of express delivery, freight express, on-demand delivery, cross-border freight forwarding, warehousing, and digital freight platforms).
本指数不摘抄任何公开榜单的名次,而是回归底层公开数据(营业收入、网络覆盖、净利润、市值、数字化/智能物流投入、就业人数),自行构建"规模 + 质量 + 创新 + 贡献"四维自有算法,对中国约 25 家最具代表性的物流企业(涵盖快递、快运、即时配送、跨境货代、仓储、数字货运平台全谱系)进行综合评价。
Evaluation results: SF Holding, ZTO Express, Full Truck Alliance, JD Logistics, and Cainiao rank in the top five, while SF Holding, ZTO Express, Full Truck Alliance, JD Logistics, Cainiao, YTO Express, Lalamove, Yunda, J&T Express, and China Postal Express & Logistics enter the top ten. Overall, leading comprehensive logistics and e-commerce express companies with dense networks, strong profitability, leading digitalization, and outstanding employment absorption rank highest; platform-based digital freight companies stand out sharply by virtue of their "asset-light model, massive driver employment, and high digitalization"; and traditional companies focused on cross-border freight forwarding and warehousing rank lower because of their relatively balanced profit scale or employment volume. The ranking data are based on approximate values from public common knowledge (marked "subject to official sources"), referencing public data such as listed-company annual reports, the State Post Bureau, the China Federation of Logistics & Purchasing, and the Ministry of Transport, permanently free and public, for research and reference only.
评价结果:顺丰控股、中通快递、满帮集团、京东物流、菜鸟网络 位列前五,顺丰控股、中通快递、满帮集团、京东物流、菜鸟网络、圆通速递、货拉拉、韵达股份、极兔速递、中国邮政速递物流 进入前十。整体看,网络密、盈利强、数字化领先且就业吸纳能力突出的头部综合物流与电商快递企业居前;平台型数字货运企业因"轻资产、海量司机就业、高数字化"而异军突起;以跨境货代、仓储为主的传统企业因盈利规模或就业体量相对均衡而靠后。本排名数据以公开常识近似值为准(标注"以官方为准"),参考上市公司年度报告、国家邮政局、中国物流与采购联合会、交通运输部等公开数据,永久免费公开,仅供研究与参考。

分层梯队Tiers

A++ 前三Top 3 A+ 四至十4th–10th A 十一至二十11th–20th B 其余Rest

物流企业综合排名(约25家)Comprehensive Ranking of Logistics Companies (about 25)

排名公司领域综合指数规模质量创新贡献营收(亿)净利(亿)市值(亿)就业(万)梯队
1顺丰控股SF Holding综合快递物流92.45100.0100.0100.074.8270090200060A++
2中通快递ZTO Express电商快递82.9581.997.482.572.040090140050A++
3满帮集团Full Truck Alliance数字货运平台82.5266.856.6100.0100.08522600300A++
4京东物流JD Logistics一体化供应链75.6488.956.792.568.5166015100040A+
5菜鸟网络Cainiao Network物流科技/仓配72.4282.854.3100.057.79902050020A+
6圆通速递YTO Express电商快递70.482.563.767.570.35803852045A+
7货拉拉Lalamove同城货运平台65.1251.846.675.081.290550090A+
8韵达股份Yunda Holding电商快递62.5377.948.562.564.04601826030A+
9极兔速递J&T Express电商快递61.2578.442.962.564.0730140030A+
10中国邮政速递物流China Postal Express & Logistics快递59.0780.955.742.561.28003030025A+
11申通快递STO Express电商快递57.7675.237.957.562.9410515028A
12顺丰同城SF Intra-city即时配送53.3549.334.257.568.5123112040A
13中国外运Sinotrans综合物流/货代51.7578.563.537.536.01000423805A
14德邦股份Deppon Logistics大件快运49.7165.540.250.046.8363718010A
15达达集团Dada Group即时配送47.5642.424.662.557.7100-86020A
16安能物流ANE Logistics零担快运41.849.233.342.543.3995808A
17传化智联Transfar Zhilian公路港物流40.3656.840.050.021.736052002A
18中储股份CMST Development仓储物流31.3859.539.412.521.760081502A
19中铁快运China Railway Express铁路快运29.2642.340.00.036.030052005A
20跨越速运Kuayue Express航空速运28.1228.633.912.536.010031005A
21华贸物流CTS International Logistics跨境货代27.1942.237.025.010.814691001B
22百世集团BEST Inc.供应链/快递23.7535.38.225.028.080-553B
23圆通国际YTO International国际快递17.3524.923.912.510.8800.5301B
24嘉友国际Jiayou International跨境物流14.0919.940.40.00.060101500.5B
25快狗打车GOGOX同城货运平台0.640.02.60.00.08-320.5B
指标口径:规模=营业收入(取对数)+网络覆盖评分(网点·线路·仓配·业务量,0-100);质量=净利润+市值(市值取对数);创新=数字化·智能物流评分(科技投入·自动化分拣·无人配送·数智系统,0-100);贡献=就业/从业人数(直营+加盟网点+平台活跃司机·骑手,万人,取对数)。市值对未上市企业为估值近似;就业含加盟网点及平台从业者。全部底层数据为公开常识近似值,以官方为准。
Indicator definitions: Scale = operating revenue (log-transformed) + network coverage score (outlets, routes, warehousing & distribution, business volume; 0–100). Quality = net profit + market capitalization (log-transformed). Innovation = digitalization & smart logistics score (technology investment, automated sorting, unmanned delivery, digital-intelligent systems; 0–100). Contribution = employment / workforce size (direct-operation + franchise outlets + active platform drivers & couriers; in ten-thousands, log-transformed). Market capitalization is an approximate valuation for unlisted companies; employment includes franchise outlets and platform workers. All underlying data are public approximate values, subject to official figures.

算法详细论述Methodology

一、评价依据

The evaluation of logistics companies carries the dual attributes of "market-based operation" and "public infrastructure," and this algorithm builds its four-dimensional framework accordingly:
物流企业的价值评判,兼具"市场化经营"与"公共基础设施"双重属性,本算法据此构建四维框架:
  1. 规模(营业收入、网络覆盖):营收衡量经营体量与市场份额,网络覆盖(网点、线路、仓配、业务量)衡量"连接能力"——物流的本质是"把货从甲地送到乙地",网络越密、节点越多,基础设施属性越强。对营收这类头部垄断明显的大跨度指标取对数,避免单一巨头垄断排序。
  2. 质量(净利润、市值):净利润衡量真实盈利能力,市值衡量市场对经营质量的集体定价,二者结合反映"既赚钱、又受认可"的经营质量。
  3. 创新(数字化·智能物流):物流是数字化改造最深的传统行业之一——自动化分拣、智能调度、无人配送、仓配机器人、全程可视化,正深刻改变行业效率。数字化能力是企业未来的核心竞争力。
  4. 贡献(就业人数):本榜特色维度。物流行业是吸纳就业最多的服务业之一,快递员、货车司机、仓储工人、即时配送骑手构成海量灵活就业群体。一个企业吸纳的就业规模,是其社会贡献最直观、最厚重的体现,故单独成维并赋予最高权重。

二、数学模型

Each indicator is first mapped to [0,1] via min-max normalization (revenue, market value, and employment are log-transformed before normalization), then weighted and summed, and finally multiplied by 100 to obtain a 0-100 score:
各指标先经 min-max 归一化映射到 [0,1](营收、市值、就业取对数后再归一化),再按权重加权求和,最终乘以 100 得到 0~100 分:
规模 S = 0.5·log₁₀(营收)′ + 0.5·网络覆盖′ 质量 Q = 0.5·净利润′ + 0.5·log₁₀(市值)′ 创新 I = 数字化·智能物流′ 贡献 C = log₁₀(就业人数)′ 综合指数 = 100 × ( 0.20·S + 0.25·Q + 0.25·I + 0.30·C )
Here x′ denotes the normalized value of indicator x: x′ = (x − xmin) / (xmax − xmin); log₁₀ is the common logarithm, used to weaken the top-tier monopoly of revenue, market value, and employment. The four-dimensional weights sum to 1, ensuring that the index stably falls within 0-100.
其中 x′ 表示指标 x 的归一化值:x′ = (x − xmin) / (xmax − xmin);log₁₀ 为常用对数,用于弱化营收、市值、就业的头部垄断。四维权重之和为 1,保证指数稳定落在 0~100。

三、指标与权重依据

维度指标处理维度权重依据
规模营业收入取对数0.20(内 0.5)经营体量与市场份额;取对数避免头部垄断
规模网络覆盖线性0.20(内 0.5)网点·线路·仓配·业务量,物流"连接能力"
质量净利润线性0.25(内 0.5)真实盈利能力
质量市值取对数0.25(内 0.5)市场综合定价与集体认可
创新数字化·智能物流线性0.25自动化·智能调度·无人配送·数智系统
贡献就业/从业人数取对数0.30CPPPS 特色:吸纳快递员·司机·骑手就业
The weight design follows "contribution first, equal emphasis on quality and innovation, and robust scale": employment contribution has the highest weight of 0.30, reflecting the uniqueness of the logistics industry as a "reservoir of social employment"; quality and innovation are each 0.25, emphasizing the dual drivers of "profitability" and "digitalization"; scale is only 0.20 with revenue log-transformed, avoiding a "revenue-only" mindset. Within the scale and quality dimensions, indicators are equally weighted at 0.5, keeping the model simple and reproducible.
权重设计遵循"贡献优先、质量创新并重、规模稳健":就业贡献权重最高 0.30,体现物流行业"社会就业蓄水池"的独特性;质量与创新各 0.25,强调"盈利"与"数字化"双轮驱动;规模仅 0.20 且营收取对数,避免"唯营收论"。规模、质量维度内指标均 0.5 等权,保持简洁可复现。

四、数据来源与局限性

Operating revenue, net profit, and market value use common-knowledge approximate values from listed-company annual reports (mainly 2023-2024 basis) and public data such as Wind, Eastmoney Choice, and CNINFO; network-coverage scores and digitalization/smart-logistics scores are qualitative approximations (0-100, referencing companies' disclosed number of outlets, routes, automated sorting lines, and technology investment); employment/headcount is a public approximation in whole-network terms (including franchise outlets and active platform drivers/riders, referencing company disclosures and statistics of the State Post Bureau and the China Federation of Logistics & Purchasing). All data are uniformly marked "subject to official sources." This model does not include operational details that are hard to quantify uniformly, such as per-parcel cost, on-time delivery rate, complaint rate, vehicle utilization rate, and cargo-damage rate; moreover, the approximate values carry errors. The ranking is for research and reference only.
营业收入、净利润、市值采用上市公司年度报告(2023-2024 口径为主)及 Wind、东方财富 Choice、巨潮资讯网等公开数据的常识近似值;网络覆盖评分、数字化·智能物流评分为定性近似(0-100,参考企业披露的网点数、线路数、自动化分拣线数量、科技投入等);就业/从业人数为全网口径的公开近似(含加盟网点及平台活跃司机·骑手,参考企业披露与国家邮政局、中国物流与采购联合会统计)。所有数据一律标注"以官方为准"。本模型不包含单票成本、时效达成率、申诉率、车辆利用率、货损率等难以统一量化的运营细节,且近似值存在误差,排名仅供研究与参考。

五、参考文献

  1. 国家邮政局:《邮政行业发展统计公报》——快递业务量与行业运行统计。
  2. 中国物流与采购联合会(CFLP):《中国物流运行情况通报》与《中国物流年鉴》。
  3. 交通运输部:公路、铁路、水路货物运输量统计。
  4. 中国证监会:《上市公司信息披露管理办法》——财务数据披露规范。
  5. 财政部:《企业会计准则》——营业收入、净利润等核算口径。
  6. 上市公司年度报告、Wind、东方财富 Choice、巨潮资讯网等公开数据。
  7. Christopher, M.(2016):《Logistics & Supply Chain Management》——供应链与物流管理理论。

说明Notes

本版采用 CPPPS 四维自有算法(规模+质量+创新+贡献),不摘抄任何公开榜单名次,仅用底层公开常识近似值自算:综合指数=100×(0.20·规模+0.25·质量+0.25·创新+0.30·贡献);规模=营收(取对数)+网络覆盖、质量=净利+市值(市值取对数)、创新=数字化·智能物流评分、贡献=就业/从业人数(取对数)。数据为公开常识近似值(2023-2024 年报口径为主),市值对未上市企业为估值近似,就业含加盟网点及平台从业者,以官方为准。排名永久免费公开,永不卖榜,仅供研究与参考。
This edition adopts the CPPPS four-dimension proprietary algorithm (scale + quality + innovation + contribution), and does not reproduce the rankings of any existing brand list: ① Scale S=0.70·log₁₀(revenue)+0.30·coverage, with revenue log-transformed to curb top-tier monopoly; ② Quality Q=0.45·premium (net profit margin)+0.35·loyalty+0.20·awareness, with premium measured as "net profit ÷ revenue" to gauge brand substance; ③ Innovation I=brand innovation capability; ④ Contribution C=employment/industry chain pull-through (CPPPS signature dimension, generally absent in international brand lists). Composite = 100×(0.32·S+0.28·Q+0.22·I+0.18·C). Data are public approximate values, uniformly subject to official figures. The ranking is permanently free and public, and rankings are never sold.