C
CPPPS 中国综合评价指数
China Panoramic Public Performance Score
中国榜 · 学府 China · Academia

中学评价Secondary School Evaluation

加权求和五维评价模型 · 排名更新日期：2026-10-20Five-dimensional weighted sum evaluation model · Last updated: 2026-10-20

综述Overview

Basic education is the cornerstone of a country's talent cultivation, and the ordinary senior high school, as the key link connecting compulsory education and higher education, has a school-running quality that directly bears on the national quality and the cultivation of reserve innovative talent. The Education Law of the People's Republic of China and the Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Reform of the Education Model of Ordinary Senior High Schools in the New Era both emphasize the educational orientation of "fostering virtue through education" and "all-round development and quality-oriented education," providing the fundamental guideline for secondary-school evaluation.
基础教育是一个国家人才培养的基石，而普通高中作为连接义务教育与高等教育的关键环节，其办学质量直接关系国民素质与创新后备力量的培育。《中华人民共和国教育法》《关于新时代推进普通高中育人方式改革的指导意见》均强调"立德树人""全面发展、素质教育"的育人导向，为中学评价提供了根本遵循。
This index takes nationally renowned ordinary senior high schools as its objects and builds a five-indicator evaluation system across the four layers of "college-admission quality — quality cultivation — faculty support — student-source foundation," performing a weighted-summation evaluation of 50 nationally renowned secondary schools. The evaluation values both quantifiable college-admission and competition outputs (Tsinghua/Peking University admissions, first-tier admission rate, and subject competitions) and structural indicators such as faculty team and student-source quality, striving to be objective, traceable, and reproducible.
本指数以全国著名普通高中为对象，构建"升学质量—素质培养—师资保障—生源基础"四层维度的五指标评价体系，对 50 所全国著名中学进行加权求和评价。评价既看重可量化的升学与竞赛产出（清北录取、一本率、学科竞赛），也纳入师资队伍与生源质量等结构性指标，力求客观、可追溯、可复现。
Evaluation results: the High School Affiliated to Renmin University of China, Chengdu No. 7 High School, the No. 2 High School of East China Normal University, Shanghai High School, and the High School Affiliated to Northwestern Polytechnical University rank in the top five. Overall, traditional prestigious schools that balance top-tier college admission with the cultivation of top-notch innovative talent (subject competitions) rank highest, and established key secondary schools in cities with strong education systems form the main body of the list. The ranking data are based on approximate values from public common knowledge, marked "subject to official sources," permanently free and public, for research and reference only.
评价结果：中国人民大学附属中学、成都市第七中学、华东师范大学第二附属中学、上海中学、西北工业大学附属中学 位列前五。整体看，兼顾顶尖升学与拔尖创新人才培养（学科竞赛）的传统名校居前，各地教育强市的老牌重点中学构成榜单主体。本排名数据以公开常识近似值为基础，标注"以官方为准"，永久免费公开，仅供研究与参考。

分层梯队Tiers

A++ 前三Top 3 A+ 四至十4th–10th A 十一至二十五 B 其余Rest

50 所著名中学评价排名Ranking of 50 Renowned Secondary Schools

排名学校省市综合得分清北录取(人)一本率(%)竞赛(分)特级教师(人)生源质量梯队
1中国人民大学附属中学The High School Affiliated to Renmin University of China北京100.0150999860100A++
2成都市第七中学Chengdu No.7 High School四川成都72.497099925095A++
3华东师范大学第二附属中学No.2 High School of East China Normal University上海71.066099954596A++
4上海中学Shanghai High School上海70.276099905097A+
5西北工业大学附属中学High School Affiliated to Northwestern Polytechnical University陕西西安68.568098905095A+
6宁波市镇海中学Ningbo Zhenhai High School浙江宁波67.057099854596A+
7北京市十一学校Beijing National Day School北京65.316099854597A+
8华中师范大学第一附属中学No.1 Middle School Affiliated to Central China Normal University湖北武汉63.66098905095A+
9北京市第四中学Beijing No.4 High School北京63.165599805098A+
10清华大学附属中学Tsinghua University High School北京60.846099824096A+
11杭州第二中学Hangzhou No.2 High School浙江杭州59.635098924594A
12华南师范大学附属中学The Affiliated High School of South China Normal University广东广州56.995098884594A
13复旦大学附属中学High School Affiliated to Fudan University上海55.95099804095A
14深圳中学Shenzhen Middle School广东深圳55.025098854594A
15北京师范大学附属实验中学The Experimental High School Attached to Beijing Normal University北京53.445099754096A
16南京师范大学附属中学High School Affiliated to Nanjing Normal University江苏南京51.735098804594A
17北京大学附属中学The Affiliated High School of Peking University北京50.95098804095A
18衡水中学Hengshui High School河北衡水50.3912095705595A
19杭州学军中学Hangzhou Xuejun High School浙江杭州47.724097904093A
20长沙市长郡中学Changjun High School湖南长沙46.024597854093A
21长沙市雅礼中学Yali High School湖南长沙46.024597854093A
22上海交通大学附属中学High School Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University上海43.684098754094A
23西安高新第一中学Xi'an Gaoxin No.1 High School陕西西安40.945097754093A
24湖南师范大学附属中学High School Attached to Hunan Normal University湖南长沙40.574096884092A
25重庆市巴蜀中学Chongqing Bashu Secondary School重庆37.814096804593A
26南京外国语学校Nanjing Foreign Language School江苏南京37.723098704095B
27北京一零一中学Beijing 101 Middle School北京37.064098703592B
28东北师范大学附属中学High School Attached to Northeast Normal University吉林长春36.974096804592B
29郑州外国语学校Zhengzhou Foreign Language School河南郑州35.945096754093B
30重庆南开中学Chongqing Nankai Secondary School重庆34.524096754593B
31石家庄市第二中学Shijiazhuang No.2 High School河北石家庄30.314095804092B
32山西大学附属中学The Affiliated High School of Shanxi University山西太原28.623595804092B
33江苏省苏州中学Suzhou High School江苏苏州27.043596704092B
34黄冈中学Huanggang High School湖北黄冈23.112595853588B
35合肥市第一中学Hefei No.1 High School安徽合肥21.23595704091B
36山东省实验中学Shandong Experimental High School山东济南20.444095654092B
37天津市第一中学Tianjin No.1 High School天津20.263096653592B
38长沙市第一中学Changsha No.1 High School湖南长沙20.183095753590B
39郑州市第一中学Zhengzhou No.1 High School河南郑州19.543595703591B
40上海市七宝中学Shanghai Qibao High School上海18.793596603592B
41广东实验中学Guangdong Experimental High School广东广州18.753595654092B
42武汉市第二中学Wuhan No.2 High School湖北武汉18.63096653590B
43天津南开中学Tianjin Nankai High School天津15.02596603592B
44厦门第一中学Xiamen No.1 High School福建厦门14.433095653591B
45绵阳中学Mianyang High School四川绵阳13.824095604088B
46成都外国语学校Chengdu Foreign Languages School四川成都13.643096603090B
47福州第一中学Fuzhou No.1 High School福建福州11.143095603591B
48大连市第二十四中学Dalian No.24 High School辽宁大连10.313095603590B
49哈尔滨市第三中学Harbin No.3 High School黑龙江哈尔滨5.313094603590B
50青岛市第二中学Qingdao No.2 High School山东青岛5.313094603590B

算法详细论述Methodology

一、评价对象与指标体系

This index targets nationally renowned ordinary senior high schools (including public, private, foreign-language, and competition-focused forms of schooling), selecting five quantifiable and traceable core indicators:
本指数面向全国著名普通高中（含公办、民办、外语类、竞赛特色等多元办学形态），选取五项可量化、可追溯的核心指标：
  1. 清华北大录取人数：顶尖高校录取是升学质量的最直观信号，反映学校在高考选拔中的头部竞争力。
  2. 一本率 / 高优率：一批次（新高考下特殊类型招生控制线）上线比例，反映整体升学质量的"广度"。
  3. 学科竞赛：五大学科（数学、物理、化学、生物、信息学）奥林匹克国家队与金银牌数量，反映拔尖创新人才培养能力。
  4. 师资（特级教师）：特级教师等骨干教师规模，是办学质量的制度性保障。
  5. 生源质量：中考录取竞争强度与生源口碑，反映学校的吸引与筛选能力。
The five indicators map respectively onto the CPPPS four-layer framework: Tsinghua/Peking University admissions and the first-tier rate correspond to the "objective output layer," subject competitions to the "contribution/top-notch innovation layer," and faculty and student source to the "basic support layer."
五项指标分别映射 CPPPS 四层框架：清北录取、一本率对应"客观产出层"，学科竞赛对应"贡献/拔尖创新层"，师资与生源对应"基础保障层"。

二、数学模型

This index adopts a weighted-summation model: the five indicators are first normalized, then linearly summed by weight, and mapped to a 0-100 score.
本指数采用加权求和模型：先对五项指标做归一化处理，再按权重线性求和，映射到 0—100 分。
归一化 x′ = (x − min) / (max − min)
Among them, "the number of Tsinghua/Peking University admissions" has large extreme-value differences among schools (top schools can reach over a hundred, while most schools number in the tens), so it is first compressed by square root (√x) before normalization to reflect the diminishing marginal returns in output scale and avoid a single school dominating this dimension absolutely. The other four indicators are directly linearly normalized.
其中"清北录取人数"因校际极端值差异大（头部校可达百人以上、多数校数十人），在归一化前先做平方根压缩（√x），以体现产出规模上的边际递减，避免单一学校在该维度上绝对主导。其余四项直接线性归一化。
综合得分 = 100 × (0.30·清北′ + 0.25·一本率′ + 0.25·竞赛′ + 0.10·师资′ + 0.10·生源′)
The weight setting reflects the orientation of "equal emphasis on college-admission quality and top-notch innovation": Tsinghua/Peking University admissions (0.30), subject competitions (0.25), and the first-tier rate (0.25) carry relatively high weights, totaling 0.80; faculty and student source, as foundational and structural indicators, each account for 0.10.
权重设定体现"升学质量与拔尖创新并重"的导向：清北录取（0.30）、学科竞赛（0.25）、一本率（0.25）三者权重较高，合计 0.80；师资与生源作为基础性、结构性指标，各占 0.10。

三、指标与权重依据

指标方向权重所属层依据
清华北大录取人数正向（平方根）0.30客观产出顶尖升学竞争力
一本率 / 高优率正向0.25客观产出整体升学广度
学科竞赛正向0.25拔尖创新奥赛国家队与金银牌
师资（特级教师）正向0.10基础保障骨干教师规模
生源质量正向0.10基础保障录取竞争与口碑

四、数据来源与可追溯性

The data of this index are mainly common-knowledge approximate values from public channels, all marked "subject to official sources," with traceable sources including:
本指数数据以公开渠道的常识近似值为主，均标注"以官方为准"，可追溯来源包括：
  1. 各中学年度高考喜报与官方公众号：清北录取人数、一本率等升学数据的主要来源。
  2. 阳光高考平台及各省教育考试院公开数据：录取批次线、上线人数等制度性数据的核对依据。
  3. 中国科协青少年科技中心：五大学科奥林匹克竞赛国家队与金银牌获奖名单。
  4. 各地教育行政部门公开信息：特级教师评定结果与师资数据。
  5. 媒体公开报道与各校年度报告：生源竞争强度、办学特色的辅助佐证。

五、局限性

This index has the following limitations: first, data such as Tsinghua/Peking University admissions and competitions fluctuate year by year, and this ranking uses common-knowledge approximations of the three-year average, which carry some error; second, educational outcomes that are hard to quantify, such as quality-oriented education and fostering virtue through education, are not fully incorporated; third, student-source quality and faculty numbers are converted scores with relatively strong subjectivity. The ranking is for research and reference only and does not constitute an official evaluation of any school.
本指数存在以下局限：其一，清北录取、竞赛等数据随年份波动，本榜采用近三年均值的常识近似，存在一定误差；其二，素质教育、立德树人等难以量化的育人成效未被充分纳入；其三，生源质量与师资数量为折算评分，主观性较强。排名仅供研究参考，不构成对任何学校的官方评价。

六、参考文献

  1. 《中华人民共和国教育法》。
  2. 国务院办公厅《关于新时代推进普通高中育人方式改革的指导意见》（国办发〔2019〕29号）。
  3. 教育部《普通高中学校办学质量评价指南》（2021）。
  4. 阳光高考平台（教育部阳光高考信息平台）。
  5. 中国科协青少年科技中心：五大学科奥林匹克竞赛获奖名单。
  6. 各省教育考试院：历年高考录取批次线、投档线公开数据。
  7. 各中学公开高考喜报、年度报告与官方公众号信息。

说明Notes

本版采用加权求和五维评价模型：综合得分 = 100 × (0.30·清北录取′ + 0.25·一本率′ + 0.25·竞赛′ + 0.10·师资′ + 0.10·生源′)。清北录取、学科竞赛、一本率权重较高（合计 0.80），体现"升学质量与拔尖创新并重"；师资与生源为结构性指标。清北录取人数先做平方根压缩再归一化，避免极端值主导。五项指标均先 min-max 归一化到 0—1。数据以各中学公开喜报、阳光高考、中国科协竞赛名单、各地教育部门公开信息等渠道的常识近似值为基础，均标注"以官方为准"，仅供研究与参考。
This edition adopts a weighted-sum five-dimension evaluation model: composite score = 100 × (0.30·Tsinghua/Peking admits′ + 0.25·first-tier admission rate′ + 0.25·competitions′ + 0.10·faculty′ + 0.10·student intake′). Tsinghua/Peking admits, subject competitions, and first-tier admission rate have higher weights (together 0.80), reflecting "both college-admission quality and top-tier innovation"; faculty and student intake are structural indicators. The Tsinghua/Peking admit count is first square-root-compressed and then normalized to avoid extreme values dominating. All five indicators are first min-max normalized to 0–1. Data are based on common-knowledge approximations from channels such as public admission announcements of schools, the Sunlight College Entrance Examination platform, China Association for Science and Technology competition lists, and education authorities' public information, all marked "subject to official figures", for research and reference only.