C
CPPPS 中国综合评价指数
China Panoramic Public Performance Score
中国榜 · 学府 China · Academia

职业教育评价Vocational Education Evaluation

全国高职高专院校（以"双高计划"院校为主）· 排名更新日期：2026-10-20National vocational colleges (mainly "Double High Plan" institutions) · Last updated: 2026-10-20

综述Overview

Vocational education and general education are two different types of education of equal importance. Mr. Huang Yanpei summarized the fundamental mission of vocational education as "giving work to those without it and giving satisfaction to those with it." The newly revised Vocational Education Law of the People's Republic of China (2022) established in legal form for the first time that "vocational education is a type of education of equal importance to general education," marking a new stage of high-quality development, quality improvement, and excellence cultivation in China's vocational education.
职业教育与普通教育是两种不同类型的教育，具有同等重要地位。黄炎培先生以"使无业者有业，使有业者乐业"概括职业教育的根本使命；2022 年新修订的《中华人民共和国职业教育法》首次以法律形式明确"职业教育是与普通教育具有同等重要地位的教育类型"，标志着我国职业教育进入高质量发展、提质培优的新阶段。
To steer the high-quality development of higher vocational education, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Finance launched in 2019 the "High-level Vocational Schools and Majors with Chinese Characteristics Construction Plan" (abbreviated as the "Double High Plan"), selecting high-level school construction units (in three tiers A, B, and C) and high-level specialty-group construction units, pooling efforts to build a highland for technical and skilled talent cultivation and a platform for technical skill innovation. It is hailed as the "Double First-Class" of vocational education.
为引领高职教育高质量发展，教育部、财政部于 2019 年启动"中国特色高水平高职学校和专业建设计划"（简称"双高计划"），遴选高水平学校建设单位（分 A、B、C 三档）与高水平专业群建设单位，集中力量打造技术技能人才培养高地和技术技能创新服务平台，被誉为职业教育的"双一流"。
Centered on "Double High Plan" institutions, this evaluation covers about 50 representative higher vocational colleges nationwide and builds a five-indicator system: Double High Plan tier, faculty strength, graduate employment rate, awards in the National Vocational College Skills Competition, and industry-education integration (school-enterprise cooperation). It adopts a weighted-sum model in which the Double High tier, skills competition, and employment rate carry higher weights, striving to objectively reflect institutions' educational strength and talent-cultivation quality.
本评价以"双高计划"院校为主体，覆盖全国约 50 所代表性高职高专院校，构建五项指标体系：双高计划档次、师资力量、毕业生就业率、全国职业院校技能大赛获奖、产教融合（校企合作），采用加权求和模型，其中双高档次、技能大赛、就业率赋予较高权重，力求客观反映院校的办学实力与人才培养质量。
Results: Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Jinhua Polytechnic, Beijing Electronic Science and Technology Institute, Wuxi Institute of Technology, and Zibo Vocational Institute, among others, rank at the top, with Tier-A high-level schools leading overall. This ranking is based primarily on public information such as the Ministry of Education's "Double High Plan" construction-unit list and the National Vocational College Skills Competition, supplemented by publicly known approximate values, is annotated "subject to official sources," remains permanently free and public, and is provided for research and reference only.
评价结果：深圳职业技术大学、金华职业技术学院、北京电子科技职业学院、无锡职业技术学院、淄博职业学院 等位居前列，A 档高水平学校整体领先。本排名以教育部"双高计划"建设单位名单、全国职业院校技能大赛等公开信息为主、公开常识近似值为辅，标注"以官方为准"，永久免费公开，仅供研究与参考。

分层梯队Tiers

A++ 前三Top 3 A+ 四至十4th–10th A 十一至二十11th–20th B 其余Rest

职业教育评价排名（约 50 所）Vocational Education Ranking (about 50 institutions)

排名院校省份双高师资就业率%大赛产教融合综合分梯队
1深圳职业技术大学Shenzhen Polytechnic University广东A档9898.5969998.3A++
2金华职业技术学院Jinhua Polytechnic浙江A档9798.2979698.04A++
3北京电子科技职业学院Beijing Electronic Science and Technology Vocational College北京A档9697.5959597.15A++
4无锡职业技术学院Wuxi Institute of Technology江苏A档9598.0939496.5A+
5淄博职业学院Zibo Vocational Institute山东A档9497.0949396.3A+
6天津职业大学Tianjin Vocational Institute天津A档9396.8929295.51A+
7浙江机电职业技术学院Zhejiang Institute of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering浙江A档9297.3929295.46A+
8常州信息职业技术学院Changzhou College of Information Technology江苏A档9297.2919094.99A+
9江苏农林职业技术学院Jiangsu Vocational College of Agriculture and Forestry江苏A档9196.5909194.55A+
10陕西工业职业技术学院Shaanxi Polytechnic Institute陕西A档9096.0899093.95A+
11广州番禺职业技术学院Guangzhou Panyu Polytechnic广东B档8895.8888788.56A
12黄河水利职业技术学院Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute河南B档8795.5878888.2A
13南京工业职业技术大学Nanjing Vocational University of Industry Technology江苏B档8895.9868788.08A
14重庆电子工程职业学院Chongqing College of Electronic Engineering重庆B档8795.6878688.02A
15宁波职业技术学院Ningbo Polytechnic浙江B档8795.8868687.81A
16四川工程职业技术大学Sichuan Vocational University of Engineering四川B档8695.4858787.43A
17长沙民政职业技术学院Changsha Social Work College湖南B档8695.2848687.04A
18芜湖职业技术学院Wuhu Institute of Technology安徽B档8595.0858587.0A
19山东商业职业技术学院Shandong Institute of Commerce and Technology山东B档8695.3848586.96A
20常州机电职业技术学院Changzhou Vocational Institute of Mechatronic Technology江苏B档8495.2848486.54A
21河北工业职业技术大学Hebei Vocational University of Industry and Technology河北B档8595.1838586.52B
22顺德职业技术学院Shunde Polytechnic广东B档8494.8838586.31B
23北京工业职业技术学院Beijing Polytechnic College北京B档8595.0828486.15B
24武汉船舶职业技术学院Wuhan Institute of Shipbuilding Technology湖北B档8494.9828385.88B
25山西工程职业学院Shanxi Engineering Vocational College山西B档8294.5808284.9B
26兰州资源环境职业技术大学Lanzhou Resources and Environment Voc-Tech University甘肃B档8294.2798184.49B
27云南交通职业技术学院Yunnan Communications Vocational and Technical College云南B档8194.3788084.01B
28辽宁农业职业技术学院Liaoning Agricultural Technical College辽宁B档8194.0778083.7B
29哈尔滨职业技术学院Harbin Vocational and Technical College黑龙江B档8093.8767983.16B
30新疆农业职业技术学院Xinjiang Vocational College of Agriculture新疆B档8093.5757982.85B
31深圳信息职业技术学院Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology广东C档8295.0848681.9B
32郑州铁路职业技术学院Zhengzhou Railway Vocational and Technical College河南C档8195.5838281.2B
33陕西铁路工程职业技术学院Shaanxi Railway Institute陕西C档8095.2828180.64B
34浙江金融职业学院Zhejiang Financial College浙江C档8195.0808080.15B
35湖南铁道职业技术学院Hunan Railway Professional Technology College湖南C档7994.5817979.9B
36重庆工程职业技术学院Chongqing Vocational Institute of Engineering重庆C档8094.8798079.71B
37山东科技职业学院Shandong Vocational College of Science and Technology山东C档8094.6787979.32B
38济南职业学院Jinan Vocational College山东C档7894.2767778.24B
39江苏经贸职业技术学院Jiangsu Vocational College of Economics and Trade江苏C档7994.0757778.1B
40烟台职业学院Yantai Vocational College山东C档7894.0757777.95B
41浙江商业职业技术学院Zhejiang Business College浙江C档7893.8747677.56B
42襄阳职业技术学院Xiangyang Polytechnic湖北C档7793.8747677.41B
43南宁职业技术学院Nanning College for Vocational Technology广西C档7893.6737677.27B
44安徽商贸职业技术学院Anhui Business College安徽C档7793.5737577.0B
45上海工艺美术职业学院Shanghai Arts and Crafts Vocational College上海C档7793.2727576.69B
46重庆城市管理职业学院Chongqing College of Urban Management重庆C档7793.0727476.55B
47海南经贸职业技术学院Hainan College of Economics and Business海南C档7693.0727476.4B
48内蒙古机电职业技术学院Inner Mongolia Technical College of Mechanics and Electrics内蒙古C档7692.8717376.01B
49河南职业技术学院Henan Polytechnic河南C档7692.5707375.7B
50江西应用技术职业学院Jiangxi College of Applied Technology江西C档7592.2697275.14B

算法详细论述Methodology

一、职业教育的评价依据与理论渊源

Evaluating vocational education is, in essence, measuring whether an institution "can cultivate students into technical and skilled talent that industry needs and society recognizes." This yardstick has deep historical and jurisprudential roots:
职业教育的评价，本质上是衡量一所院校"能否把学生培养成产业需要、社会认可的技术技能人才"。这一评价尺度有其深厚的历史与法理渊源：
  1. 黄炎培职业教育思想：倡导"手脑并用、做学合一"，提出"使无业者有业，使有业者乐业"——为"就业率"与"产教融合"两项指标提供了思想依据。
  2. 《中华人民共和国职业教育法》（2022 修订）：确立职业教育与普通教育同等重要的法律地位，明确"产教融合、校企合作、工学结合、知行合一"的办学方针——为"产教融合"指标提供法理依据。
  3. 《国家职业教育改革实施方案》（"职教20条"，2019）：提出"没有职业教育现代化就没有教育现代化"，要求深化复合型技术技能人才培养培训模式改革——为指标体系整体提供政策依据。
  4. "双高计划"（教职成〔2019〕5 号）：教育部、财政部集中力量建设一批引领改革、支撑发展、中国特色、世界水平的高职学校和专业群——为"双高计划档次"指标提供直接依据。
  5. 全国职业院校技能大赛：由教育部等多部门主办的国家级职业技能竞赛，是衡量职业院校学生技能水平的权威标尺——为"技能大赛获奖"指标提供依据。

二、指标体系设计

This evaluation adopts five indicators covering five dimensions—policy positioning, faculty assurance, cultivation quality, skill level, and school-enterprise synergy—all uniformly mapped to a 0–100 scale:
本评价采用五项指标，覆盖"政策定位—师资保障—培养质量—技能水平—校企协同"五个维度，五项指标均统一映射至 0–100 分区间：
  1. 双高计划档次：反映院校在国家职教战略布局中的定位，按高水平学校建设单位 A 档（100 分）、B 档（85 分）、C 档（70 分）赋分。
  2. 师资力量：综合专任教师规模、双师型教师占比、教学名师与教学创新团队等要素的近似评分。
  3. 毕业生就业率：毕业去向落实率（%），直接反映人才培养的市场适应度。
  4. 全国职业院校技能大赛获奖：历年累计获奖水平的近似评分，反映学生实操技能与教学成效。
  5. 产教融合（校企合作）：综合产业学院、现代学徒制、订单培养、实训基地等校企协同深度的近似评分。

三、模型的数学结构

This evaluation adopts a weighted-sum model, performing linear weighting after all five indicators are mapped to a 0–100 scale:
本评价采用加权求和模型，五项指标均映射至 0–100 分后进行线性加权：
S = 0.30·双高档次 + 0.25·技能大赛 + 0.20·就业率 + 0.15·师资 + 0.10·产教融合
The weight design follows the principle of "giving equal weight to policy positioning and skill level while prioritizing cultivation quality": the Double High tier (0.30) reflects national strategic positioning, the skills competition (0.25) reflects hands-on skill level, the employment rate (0.20) reflects cultivation quality, faculty (0.15) reflects teaching assurance, and industry-education integration (0.10) reflects school-enterprise synergy. The five weights sum to 1, the composite score ranges from 0 to 100, and institutions are ranked in descending order with ties sharing the same rank.
权重设计遵循"政策定位与技能水平并重、培养质量优先"的原则：双高档次（0.30）体现国家战略定位，技能大赛（0.25）体现实操技能水平，就业率（0.20）体现培养质量，师资（0.15）体现教学保障，产教融合（0.10）体现校企协同。五项权重之和为 1，综合分取值范围 0–100，按降序排名、同分并列。

四、指标与权重依据

指标方向权重依据
双高计划档次正向0.30教育部、财政部"双高计划"（教职成〔2019〕5 号）
全国职业院校技能大赛获奖正向0.25教育部等主办的国家级职业技能竞赛
毕业生就业率正向0.20黄炎培"使无业者有业"；职业教育法人才培养定位
师资力量正向0.15职教20条"双师型"教师队伍建设
产教融合（校企合作）正向0.10职业教育法"产教融合、校企合作"办学方针

五、数据来源与局限性

The Double High Plan tier is based on the construction-unit list of the "High-level Vocational Schools and Majors with Chinese Characteristics Construction Plan" published by the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Finance (the A/B/C tiers being public facts). Faculty strength, skills-competition awards, and industry-education integration are publicly known approximate values, and the graduate employment rate is an approximation consistent with the caliber of institutions' Annual Quality Reports on Higher Vocational Education, all annotated "subject to official sources." This model does not include subjective reputation, regional differences, or historical accumulation that are hard to quantify; the approximations carry error, and the ranking is provided for research and reference only.
双高计划档次依据教育部、财政部公布的"中国特色高水平高职学校和专业建设计划"建设单位名单（A/B/C 档为公开事实）；师资力量、技能大赛获奖、产教融合为公开常识近似值，毕业生就业率为院校《高等职业教育质量年度报告》口径的近似值，均标注"以官方为准"。本模型不包含难以量化的主观口碑、地域差异与历史积淀，近似值存在误差，排名仅供研究与参考。

六、参考文献

  1. 教育部、财政部：《关于实施中国特色高水平高职学校和专业建设计划的意见》（教职成〔2019〕5 号）。
  2. 教育部、财政部：中国特色高水平高职学校和专业建设计划建设单位名单。
  3. 教育部等：《全国职业院校技能大赛》历届获奖名单。
  4. 全国人大常委会：《中华人民共和国职业教育法》（2022 年修订）。
  5. 国务院：《国家职业教育改革实施方案》（国发〔2019〕4 号，"职教20条"）。
  6. 中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅：《关于深化现代职业教育体系建设改革的意见》（2022）。
  7. 黄炎培：《职业教育》文集（"手脑并用""使无业者有业，使有业者乐业"）。
  8. 各高职院校：《高等职业教育质量年度报告》。

说明Notes

本版采用加权求和模型 S = 0.30·双高档次 + 0.25·技能大赛 + 0.20·就业率 + 0.15·师资 + 0.10·产教融合，五项指标均映射至 0–100 分，双高档次（0.30）、技能大赛（0.25）、就业率（0.20）权重较高。双高档次依据教育部、财政部"双高计划"建设单位名单（A/B/C 档为公开事实），其余指标为公开常识近似值，以官方为准。本排名永久免费公开、永不卖榜，数据标注截止日与算法版本。
This edition adopts a weighted-sum model S = 0.30·Double-High tier + 0.25·skills competitions + 0.20·employment rate + 0.15·faculty + 0.10·industry-education integration, with all five indicators mapped to 0–100 points; Double-High tier (0.30), skills competitions (0.25), and employment rate (0.20) have higher weights. The Double-High tier is based on the list of construction units under the Ministry of Education and Ministry of Finance "Double-High Plan" (A/B/C tiers are public facts), and the remaining indicators are public approximate values, subject to official figures. This ranking is permanently free and public, rankings are never sold, and data are marked with cutoff date and algorithm version.