全球榜 · 学府 Global · Academia

世界大学指数World University Index

CPPPS 自有四维算法(规模+质量+创新+贡献) · 排名更新日期:2026-10-28

综述Overview

Universities are the "wellspring" of modern civilization: they produce knowledge, cultivate talent, and shape a nation's long-term competitiveness. Since 2004, institutions such as QS, Times Higher Education (THE), US News, and ShanghaiRanking (ARWU) have successively published world university rankings, but their indicator systems generally overweight international papers, reputation surveys, and internationalization while paying insufficient attention to a university's contribution of "cultivating talent for and serving the science, technology, and industry of its own country."
大学是现代文明的「源头活水」:它既生产知识、培养人才,也塑造一个国家长期竞争力。自 2004 年以来,QS、泰晤士高等教育(THE)、US News、软科(ARWU)等机构先后发布世界大学排名,但其指标体系普遍偏重国际论文、声誉调查与国际化程度,对一所大学「为本国培养人才、服务本国科技与产业」的贡献关注不足。
This index does not directly reproduce the rankings of QS/THE/US News/ARWU; instead, it takes their underlying public data (paper counts, highly cited papers, Nobel Prizes/Fields Medals, top scholars, research funding, student scale, etc.) and redesigns the weights and independently computes the ranking according to CPPPS's own four-dimension framework of "Scale + Quality + Innovation + Contribution." This is CPPPS's consistent stance: never copy rankings, only compute data, with an open and reproducible algorithm.
本指数不直接转载 QS/THE/US News/ARWU 的名次,而是取其背后的底层公开数据(论文数、高被引论文、诺奖/菲尔兹奖、顶尖学者、科研经费、学生规模等),按照 CPPPS「规模 + 质量 + 创新 + 贡献」四维自有评价框架,重新设计权重、独立计算排名。这是 CPPPS 的一贯立场:不抄名次、只算数据、算法公开、可复现。
Four-dimension mapping: Scale corresponds to paper counts and enrolled student numbers (academic volume); Quality corresponds to highly cited papers, top scholars, Nobel Prizes/Fields Medals, and "academic intensity" (per-paper impact, fairly evaluating small-but-elite institutions); Innovation corresponds to research funding and top-journal original achievements (input and output); Contribution corresponds to domestic talent-cultivation contribution—a CPPPS-distinctive dimension measuring a university's ability to cultivate top talent for and sustain the science, technology, and industrial development of its own country, in contrast to Western rankings that "only look at international papers and international reputation."
四维映射:规模对应论文数与在校学生数(学术体量);质量对应高被引论文、顶尖学者、诺奖/菲尔兹奖与「学术强度」(篇均影响力,公平评价小而精学府);创新对应科研经费与顶刊原创成果(投入与产出);贡献对应本国人才培养贡献——这是 CPPPS 特色维度,衡量一所大学为其本国培养顶尖人才、支撑本国科技与产业发展的能力,区别于西方榜单「只看国际论文与国际声誉」的视角。
Results: among 100 universities worldwide, Harvard University (US), Stanford University (US), MIT (US), UC Berkeley (US), and the University of Oxford (UK) rank in the top five. Overall, top Anglo-American research universities with balanced academic volume, quality, and innovation investment lead the field; while Chinese universities such as Tsinghua, Peking, Zhejiang, and Shanghai Jiao Tong rank firmly near the top on the strength of world-class academic volume and extremely high domestic talent-cultivation contribution, reflecting the fair assessment of Eastern research universities by CPPPS's "domestic contribution" dimension. This ranking is based on publicly known approximate values, is annotated "subject to official sources," remains permanently free and public, and is provided for research and reference only.
评价结果:全球 100 所大学中,哈佛大学(美)、斯坦福大学(美)、麻省理工学院(美)、加州大学伯克利分校(美)、牛津大学(英) 位列前五。整体看,学术体量、质量与创新投入均衡的英美顶尖研究型大学居前;而清华、北大、浙大、上交等中国大学凭借世界第一流的学术体量与极高的本国人才培养贡献稳居前列,体现了 CPPPS「本国贡献」维度对东方研究型大学的公允评价。本排名数据以公开常识近似值为准,标注「以官方为准」,永久免费公开,仅供研究与参考。

分层梯队Tiers

A++ 前三Top 3 A+ 四至十4th–10th A 十一至二十11th–20th B 其余Rest

世界大学指数排名(100所)World University Index Ranking (100)

排名大学大学指数规模质量创新贡献论文(万/年)诺奖/菲尔兹梯队
1哈佛大学(美)Harvard University79.6881.285.582.162.52.6160A++
2斯坦福大学(美)Stanford University71.1970.274.487.950.02.285A++
3麻省理工学院(美)Massachusetts Institute of Technology67.0555.074.063.462.51.6100A++
4加州大学伯克利分校(美)University of California, Berkeley61.2080.469.548.737.51.9110A+
5牛津大学(英)University of Oxford58.5572.165.337.650.01.972A+
6中国科学院大学(中)University of Chinese Academy of Sciences57.8164.839.934.875.01.50A+
7剑桥大学(英)University of Cambridge54.2169.264.731.037.51.8120A+
8国防科技大学(中)National University of Defense Technology49.7944.624.829.9100.00.60A+
9清华大学(中)Tsinghua University48.2094.429.855.0100.02.72A+
10哥伦比亚大学(美)Columbia University47.3068.453.637.125.01.5100A+
11北京大学(中)Peking University43.6887.728.437.775.02.44A
12约翰斯·霍普金斯大学(美)Johns Hopkins University43.6367.943.444.825.01.540A
13东京大学(日)The University of Tokyo42.7969.828.920.375.01.710A
14浙江大学(中)Zhejiang University41.2999.516.526.062.53.01A
15京都大学(日)Kyoto University40.7859.629.814.975.01.411A
16上海交通大学(中)Shanghai Jiao Tong University39.9692.812.720.937.52.81A
17复旦大学(中)Fudan University39.7774.827.924.662.51.91A
18苏黎世联邦理工学院(瑞士)ETH Zurich39.6356.645.126.425.01.232A
19伦敦大学学院(英)University College London39.6280.445.219.812.51.934A
20加州大学旧金山分校(美)University of California, San Francisco39.2839.855.225.412.51.010A
21耶鲁大学(美)Yale University38.0548.443.130.025.01.265B
22加州理工学院(美)California Institute of Technology37.990.067.119.312.50.676B
23南京大学(中)Nanjing University37.5069.727.821.850.01.61B
24加州大学洛杉矶分校(美)University of California, Los Angeles36.5978.536.528.212.52.025B
25华盛顿大学(美)University of Washington36.0674.635.830.512.52.025B
26中国科学技术大学(中)University of Science and Technology of China35.8954.634.829.850.01.11B
27多伦多大学(加)University of Toronto35.7387.431.315.325.02.010B
28密歇根大学(美)University of Michigan35.2280.428.127.525.01.88B
29加州大学圣地亚哥分校(美)University of California, San Diego34.2963.435.929.712.51.720B
30芝加哥大学(美)University of Chicago33.9744.839.718.825.01.0100B
31武汉大学(中)Wuhan University33.6359.619.817.750.01.30B
32洛桑联邦理工学院(瑞士)École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne33.4439.739.819.925.01.02B
33华中科技大学(中)Huazhong University of Science and Technology32.8564.419.821.750.01.40B
34普林斯顿大学(美)Princeton University32.7632.748.911.112.50.970B
35卡内基梅隆大学(美)Carnegie Mellon University32.6644.834.640.212.50.820B
36西安交通大学(中)Xi'an Jiaotong University32.4764.319.719.850.01.30B
37帝国理工学院(英)Imperial College London32.4356.335.411.725.01.314B
38宾夕法尼亚大学(美)University of Pennsylvania32.3560.332.017.325.01.328B
39北京航空航天大学(中)Beihang University31.9349.619.824.662.50.90B
40慕尼黑大学(德)LMU Munich31.8754.634.811.625.01.440B
41康奈尔大学(美)Cornell University31.4855.138.313.712.51.155B
42哈尔滨工业大学(中)Harbin Institute of Technology31.4564.619.824.762.51.40B
43伊利诺伊大学香槟分校(美)University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign31.3768.430.124.512.51.830B
44中山大学(中)Sun Yat-sen University31.3759.519.717.650.01.30B
45北京理工大学(中)Beijing Institute of Technology31.3444.617.824.762.50.80B
46爱丁堡大学(英)University of Edinburgh31.3464.834.614.812.51.620B
47东南大学(中)Southeast University31.0754.419.821.650.01.10B
48四川大学(中)Sichuan University30.9854.317.814.650.01.20B
49杜克大学(美)Duke University30.8045.336.822.612.51.215B
50威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校(美)University of Wisconsin-Madison30.5274.228.219.712.51.726B
51同济大学(中)Tongji University29.9954.519.719.750.01.10B
52德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校(美)University of Texas at Austin29.7868.928.020.612.51.813B
53西北大学(美)Northwestern University29.7546.235.120.412.51.319B
54慕尼黑工业大学(德)Technical University of Munich29.7068.427.08.725.01.217B
55鲁汶大学(比)KU Leuven29.3954.429.711.625.01.35B
56卡罗林斯卡学院(瑞典)Karolinska Institute29.3934.839.914.812.50.98B
57代尔夫特理工大学(荷)Delft University of Technology29.3644.629.819.825.01.02B
58天津大学(中)Tianjin University29.1754.317.719.750.01.10B
59英属哥伦比亚大学(加)University of British Columbia29.0464.729.814.912.51.58B
60曼彻斯特大学(英)University of Manchester28.9264.229.814.612.51.525B
61海德堡大学(德)Heidelberg University28.7044.831.99.825.01.130B
62麦吉尔大学(加)McGill University28.3159.629.914.812.51.412B
63佐治亚理工学院(美)Georgia Institute of Technology27.9554.625.330.112.51.37B
64纽约大学(美)New York University27.7655.030.214.812.51.437B
65南开大学(中)Nankai University27.1844.519.714.637.50.90B
66索邦大学(法)Sorbonne University27.1059.729.87.912.51.430B
67巴黎萨克雷大学(法)Université Paris-Saclay26.9554.929.611.812.51.38B
68伦敦国王学院(英)King's College London26.9254.329.711.912.51.514B
69香港大学(香港)The University of Hong Kong26.8549.829.914.912.51.31B
70山东大学(中)Shandong University26.6254.317.714.637.51.20B
71阿姆斯特丹大学(荷)University of Amsterdam26.5054.229.69.812.51.36B
72明尼苏达大学(美)University of Minnesota26.4063.924.814.212.51.515B
73哥本哈根大学(丹麦)University of Copenhagen26.3149.829.911.712.51.213B
74莱斯大学(美)Rice University26.2824.634.819.912.50.53B
75厦门大学(中)Xiamen University26.1144.417.814.737.50.90B
76普渡大学(美)Purdue University26.0454.824.919.812.51.313B
77布里斯托大学(英)University of Bristol25.3549.727.911.812.51.213B
78吉林大学(中)Jilin University25.2054.214.711.637.51.20B
79北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校(美)University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill25.1054.125.014.612.51.39B
80中南大学(中)Central South University25.0454.317.817.637.51.10B
81华南理工大学(中)South China University of Technology24.6649.514.817.737.51.00B
82俄亥俄州立大学(美)Ohio State University24.4964.121.611.812.51.55B
83圣路易斯华盛顿大学(美)Washington University in St. Louis24.4634.829.714.612.50.825B
84香港科技大学(香港)The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology24.4534.627.919.812.50.80B
85马里兰大学(美)University of Maryland24.2849.524.615.012.51.26B
86宾夕法尼亚州立大学(美)Pennsylvania State University23.9359.421.812.112.51.45B
87格拉斯哥大学(英)University of Glasgow23.4549.324.89.712.51.18B
88首尔大学(韩)Seoul National University23.3361.47.33.650.01.31B
89悉尼大学(澳)University of Sydney23.2464.624.89.70.01.51B
90香港中文大学(香港)The Chinese University of Hong Kong23.1244.624.811.912.51.21B
91波士顿大学(美)Boston University23.0044.624.711.512.51.18B
92墨尔本大学(澳)University of Melbourne22.8273.722.75.10.01.45B
93澳大利亚国立大学(澳)Australian National University22.5149.727.99.80.01.26B
94巴黎文理研究大学(法)Paris Sciences et Lettres University (PSL)22.4248.225.91.512.51.020B
95伦敦政治经济学院(英)London School of Economics22.1129.629.94.812.50.518B
96范德堡大学(美)Vanderbilt University21.6234.225.011.712.50.87B
97新加坡国立大学(新加坡)National University of Singapore20.5769.212.410.212.51.40B
98昆士兰大学(澳)The University of Queensland20.0354.621.97.80.01.31B
99莫纳什大学(澳)Monash University19.9054.321.87.60.01.31B
100南洋理工大学(新加坡)Nanyang Technological University14.1661.48.55.10.01.20B
规模、质量、创新、贡献四列均为 0–100 子项得分;论文数与诺奖/菲尔兹奖为原始近似值(以官方为准)。
The four columns Scale, Quality, Innovation, and Contribution are all 0–100 sub-scores (horizontally normalized within each discipline). Scale = discipline paper count'; Quality = (discipline highly-cited' + discipline top scholars')/2; Innovation = discipline original achievements'; Contribution = discipline talent cultivation / achievement transformation'. Data are public approximate values, subject to official figures.
The four columns Scale, Quality, Innovation, and Contribution are all 0–100 sub-scores; total papers, highly-cited papers, and Nobel Prizes are raw approximate values (subject to official figures).
The four columns Scale, Quality, Innovation, and Contribution are all 0–100 sub-scores; paper counts and Nobel/Fields Prizes are raw approximate values (subject to official figures).

算法详细论述Methodology

一、评价依据

This algorithm follows the CPPPS proprietary evaluation-algorithm specification: it does not excerpt rankings from public lists but computes them from underlying public data, designing its own weights and ranking independently. It uses eight measurable public data items and derives one "academic intensity" indicator, mapped onto the CPPPS four-dimension framework:
本算法遵循 CPPPS 自有评价算法规范:不摘抄公开榜单名次,用底层公开数据自算,设计自有权重、独立排名。底层采用八项可测度的公开数据,并派生一项「学术强度」指标,映射到 CPPPS 四维框架:
  1. 规模:年论文数与在校学生数,衡量一所大学的学术体量与人才培养容量。
  2. 质量:高被引论文、顶尖学者(科睿唯安高被引科学家)、诺奖/菲尔兹奖累计三项「绝对质量」,加上「学术强度」(篇均影响力)一项「相对质量」,公平评价「小而精」的顶尖学府。
  3. 创新:科研经费(投入)与顶刊原创成果(Nature/Science/Cell 发文,产出)合成,衡量创新能力。
  4. 贡献:本国人才培养贡献——衡量一所大学为本国培养顶尖人才、支撑本国科技与产业的能力,CPPPS 特色维度,源自「利他贡献观」:大学的价值不仅在于国际发表,更在于为本国与民族创造价值。

二、数学模型

Each underlying indicator is first range-normalized to [0,1]; large-span scale indicators (paper count, student count, and highly cited papers) and the long-tail indicator (Nobel Prizes/Fields Medals) are log-transformed to avoid top-tier monopoly and compress the extreme tail.
各底层指标先经极差标准化到 [0,1];规模类大跨度指标(论文数、学生数、高被引论文)与长尾指标(诺奖/菲尔兹奖)取对数,避免头部垄断、压缩极端长尾。
规模 S = ( log₁₀(论文数)′ + log₁₀(学生数)′ ) / 2 质量 Q = 0.20·log₁₀(高被引)′ + 0.20·顶尖学者′ + 0.35·log₁₀(诺奖/菲尔兹)′ + 0.25·学术强度′ 学术强度 = log₁₀[ (高被引 + 顶尖学者) / 论文数 ]′ 创新 I = ( 科研经费′ + 顶刊原创成果′ ) / 2 贡献 C = 本国人才培养贡献′ 世界大学指数 = 100 × ( 0.15·S + 0.48·Q + 0.17·I + 0.20·C )
Weight settings: Quality is highest (48%, as academic substance is the core of a university, with "Nobel Prizes/Fields Medals" accounting for 35% of Quality and "academic intensity" for 25%, jointly evaluating small-but-elite top institutions fairly); Innovation (17%) and Scale (15%) are balanced; and Contribution accounts for 20%—reflecting CPPPS's high regard for the value of "universities serving their own country," which is also the most essential difference between CPPPS and the four major Western rankings.
权重设定:质量最高(48%,学术含金量是大学的核心,其中「诺奖/菲尔兹奖」占质量 35%、「学术强度」占质量 25%,共同公平评价小而精的顶尖学府),创新(17%)与规模(15%)并重,贡献占 20%——体现 CPPPS 对「大学服务本国」价值的高度重视,这也是 CPPPS 与西方四大榜单最本质的区别。

三、指标与权重依据

维度底层指标总权重处理依据
规模年论文数7.5%对数学术体量;对数避免头部垄断
规模在校学生数7.5%对数人才培养容量
质量高被引论文9.6%对数学术影响力
质量顶尖学者9.6%线性顶尖人才储备
质量诺奖/菲尔兹奖16.8%对数学术最高荣誉(对数压缩长尾)
质量学术强度(篇均影响力)12%对数公平评价小而精学府(类比软科「师均表现」)
创新科研经费8.5%线性创新投入
创新顶刊原创成果8.5%线性创新产出
贡献本国人才培养贡献20%线性CPPPS 特色:为本国培养人才/科技贡献
The weights sum to 100%. Compared with QS/THE/US News/ARWU, CPPPS differs in that: ① it does not use subjective surveys such as "academic reputation + employer reputation" (50% in QS) but switches entirely to objective underlying data; ② it adds a "domestic talent-cultivation contribution" dimension with a 20% weight, fairly evaluating universities that cultivate talent for and sustain the science, technology, and industry of their own country; ③ "internationalization" is not made an independent dimension (Western rankings award points for the share of international students/faculty, which in practice favors English-speaking countries, so CPPPS removes it); ④ the Quality dimension adds "academic intensity (per-paper impact)" to avoid the unfairness of absolute volume against "small-but-elite" institutions.
合计权重 100%。与 QS/THE/US News/ARWU 相比,CPPPS 的差异在于:①不采用「学术声誉+雇主声誉」这类主观调查(QS 中占 50%),全部改用客观底层数据;②新增「本国人才培养贡献」维度并赋予 20% 权重,公正评价为本土培养人才、支撑本国科技与产业的大学;③「国际化」不单独成维(西方榜单以国际生/国际教师占比加分,实际利于英语国家,CPPPS 予以剔除);④质量维度加入「学术强度(篇均影响力)」,避免绝对体量对「小而精」学府的不公。

四、数据来源与局限性

Paper counts and highly cited papers reference Web of Science/ESI and Scopus calibers; top scholars reference Clarivate's Highly Cited Researchers (HCR) list; Nobel Prizes/Fields Medals reference official award rosters (cumulative faculty/alumni caliber); research funding and student scale reference each school's public annual reports; top-journal publications reference annual Nature/Science/Cell statistics; and domestic talent-cultivation contribution is CPPPS's expert approximate score based on "cultivated academicians, statesmen, and top talent, and support for the country's science-technology industry." All values are publicly known approximate values, annotated "subject to official sources." Limitations: ① Nobel Prizes/Fields Medals are cumulative values, favoring long-established European and American universities (alleviated by log transformation); ② "domestic talent-cultivation contribution" is a subjective score with some uncertainty; ③ statistical calibers differ across institutions (papers include co-authorship, students include continuing education); ④ the sample covers 100 universities and does not encompass all universities. The ranking is for research and reference only.
论文数、高被引论文参考 Web of Science/ESI 与 Scopus 口径,顶尖学者参考科睿唯安高被引科学家(HCR)名单,诺奖/菲尔兹奖参考官方获奖名录(教师/校友累计口径),科研经费与学生规模参考各校公开年报,顶刊发文参考 Nature/Science/Cell 年度统计,本国人才培养贡献为 CPPPS 基于「培养的院士/政要/顶尖人才、对本国科技产业支撑」的专家近似评分。所有数值均为公开常识近似值,标注「以官方为准」。局限性:①诺奖/菲尔兹奖为累计值,偏袒历史悠久的欧美老牌名校(已取对数缓解);②「本国人才培养贡献」为主观评分,存在一定不确定性;③各校统计口径(论文含合作署名、学生含继续教育)不一致;④样本覆盖 100 所大学,未涵盖全部高校。排名仅供研究与参考。

五、参考文献

  1. 科睿唯安(Clarivate):Essential Science Indicators(ESI)高被引论文数据。
  2. 科睿唯安(Clarivate):全球高被引科学家(Highly Cited Researchers)名单。
  3. 诺贝尔奖、菲尔兹奖官方获奖名录。
  4. Web of Science / Scopus:各校年发文量统计口径。
  5. 各大学公开年报:科研经费与学生规模数据。
  6. Nature / Science / Cell:年度发文统计。
  7. 软科世界大学学术排名(ARWU)方法论:「师均表现」指标之思想参照。
  8. CPPPS《自有评价算法规范》:规模+质量+创新+贡献四维框架与「不抄名次、只算数据」原则。

说明Notes

本版采用 CPPPS 自有四维算法(非简单转载 QS/THE/US News/ARWU 名次):①规模 S=(log₁₀论文数′+log₁₀学生数′)/2,体量指标取对数避免头部垄断;②质量 Q=0.20·log₁₀高被引′+0.20·顶尖学者′+0.35·log₁₀诺奖/菲尔兹′+0.25·学术强度′,绝对质量与篇均影响力并重,公平评价小而精学府;③创新 I=(科研经费′+顶刊原创成果′)/2,投入与产出并重;④贡献 C=本国人才培养贡献′,为本国培养人才/支撑本国科技产业(CPPPS 特色,区别于西方只看国际论文);⑤综合大学指数=100×(0.15S+0.48Q+0.17I+0.20C)。数据为公开常识近似值,以官方为准。本排名永久免费公开、算法公开、可复现、永不卖榜。
This edition adopts the CPPPS proprietary four-dimension algorithm (not a simple reproduction of QS/THE/US News/ARWU rankings): ① Scale S=(log₁₀paper count′+log₁₀student count′)/2, with volume indicators log-transformed to avoid top-tier monopoly; ② Quality Q=0.20·log₁₀highly cited′+0.20·top scholars′+0.35·log₁₀Nobel/Fields′+0.25·academic intensity′, balancing absolute quality and per-paper influence to fairly evaluate small but elite institutions; ③ Innovation I=(research funding′+top-journal original output′)/2, balancing input and output; ④ Contribution C=domestic talent-cultivation contribution′, cultivating talent for one's own country/supporting the country's science and technology industry (CPPPS signature, distinct from the West's focus solely on international papers); ⑤ Composite university index = 100×(0.15S+0.48Q+0.17I+0.20C). Data are public approximate values, subject to official figures. This ranking is permanently free and public, with public algorithm, reproducible, and rankings never sold.